Syria's Fourth Criminal Court convicted Ahmad Badreddine Hassoun of war crimes and crimes against humanity, extending the country's transitional-justice process into its former religious establishment for the first time.
DAMASCUS — Syria's Fourth Criminal Court sentenced Ahmad Badreddine
Hassoun, the country's former grand mufti under Bashar al-Assad, to life in
prison on August 24, 2026. The Damascus court delivered the ruling during the
sixth session of Hassoun's trial. Judges convicted the former religious
official of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his role during Syria's
civil war.
The panel found that Hassoun's office had provided religious
justification for military operations. It found that he financed an armed
faction linked to abuses against civilians, and that he accepted money and
gifts to help free people detained by the former government's security
agencies. The verdict extends Syria's transitional-justice process beyond the
security and military officials who dominated earlier cases, reaching into the
country's religious establishment for the first time.
What the Damascus Court Found
Judge Fakhr al-Din al-Aryan presided over the panel, joined by judges
Abdul Hamid al-Hamoud and Hossam Abdul Rahman. Judge Omar al-Radi represented
the public prosecution. Members of Syria's National Commission for Transitional
Justice attended the proceedings, along with representatives from international
legal and humanitarian organizations, according to the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA).
The trial opened June 25 with an indictment accusing Hassoun of exploiting his
position to build extensive, unofficial ties with al-Assad, security and
military officials, and leaders of sectarian militias.
Judge al-Aryan placed the case in the context of Syria's 2011 uprising.
He said security and military forces met peaceful demonstrations that year with
live ammunition. Civilians subsequently faced killings, torture, sexual
violence, forced displacement and enforced disappearance, the judge said. SANA
reported that the court examined Hassoun's conduct against this backdrop rather
than treating his public statements in isolation.
Judges found that the religious establishment Hassoun led had provided
religious cover for military and security operations. That cover extended to
the use of barrel bombs against populated civilian areas, conduct the judge
described as a violation of international humanitarian law. Beyond his public
statements, the panel found that Hassoun regularly financed the leadership of
Liwa al-Quds, an armed formation linked to serious violations against
civilians. Judges said this support went beyond charity and materially
strengthened the group's military activity.
The panel separately found that Hassoun accepted money and gifts in
exchange for intervening to help secure the release of civilians held by the
former government's security agencies. Judges characterized these actions,
taken together, as aiding, abetting and providing moral support that made an
effective contribution to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
محكمة الجنايات الرابعة بدمشق تحكم بالسجن المؤبد بحق المتهم أحمد بدر الدين حسون، في جلسة النطق بالحكم، وفقاً للأصول القانونية.#الجمهورية_العربية_السورية #وزارة_العدل pic.twitter.com/lfKF48Vlab
— وزارة العدل السورية (@SyrMOf) August 24, 2026
The Charges and Sentence
Judges convicted Hassoun on multiple counts and merged the custodial
terms into a single sentence. His convictions included:
●
Inciting civil war and sectarian
strife: life imprisonment
●
Incitement to intentional killing:
20 years
●
Principal participation in
intentional killing: 10 years
●
Abuse of office: three years
●
Provoking sectarian and racial
tension: six months
The panel merged these terms and ordered enforcement of the most severe
penalty, life imprisonment. Beyond the prison sentence, the court imposed
several additional measures:
●
A fine of 1,000 Syrian pounds
●
A separate fine equal to three
times the money Hassoun received for abuse of office, which SANA reported as
$195,000
●
Loss of Hassoun's civil rights
●
Confiscation of his assets for the
public treasury, once civil obligations are met
●
Compensation for plaintiffs whose
claims were accepted, with other victims' families retaining the right to
pursue separate claims
●
Continued witness-protection
measures shielding the identities of protected witnesses
●
A bar on amnesty, conditional
release or a suspended sentence, given the gravity of the offenses
Prosecutors retained the right to pursue other officials or accomplices
in the case if further evidence emerges.
جانب من جلسة النطق بالحكم بحق المتهم أحمد بدر الدين حسون، أمام محكمة الجنايات الرابعة في القصر العدلي بدمشق.#الجمهورية_العربية_السورية #وزارة_العدل pic.twitter.com/a64pmzqw6t
— وزارة العدل السورية (@SyrMOf) August 24, 2026
Why the Verdict Matters
Hassoun's conviction differs from earlier Assad-era cases. Most previous
defendants were senior security or military officials, and several were Assad's
own relatives. Hassoun instead built his career as a cleric. Prosecutors argued
that his religious authority, not a weapon or a command post, made him a
participant in wartime abuses.
The case tests whether Syria's judiciary will treat ideological and
institutional support for atrocities as criminally significant, not only direct
violence. It also marks the first time the country's young transitional-justice
process has reached into the religious establishment, a body that operated
closely alongside the security state under Assad's government.
أحمد بدر الدين حسون أمام القضاء.. منبرٌ وظّف للتحريض …والعدالة تقول كلمتها.#الجمهورية_العربية_السورية #وزارة_العدل pic.twitter.com/HeYfvDprm1
— وزارة العدل السورية (@SyrMOf) August 24, 2026
The Legal Basis of the Trial
Hassoun's trial, like other Assad-era cases before the Fourth Criminal
Court, proceeds without a dedicated transitional-justice law. Syria's
parliament has not yet convened to pass one, and the domestic penal code does
not explicitly codify war crimes or crimes against humanity as distinct
offenses. In earlier proceedings before the same court, Judge al-Aryan grounded
these prosecutions in Syria's Constitutional Declaration, the country's interim
charter. He cited a provision recognizing rights under international treaties
Syria has ratified, and another excluding war crimes, crimes against humanity
and genocide committed by the former government from statutory time limits,
according to reporting by Syria Direct.
Judges have also applied the Geneva Conventions and other international
instruments as an interpretive framework alongside Syrian law. Syria has signed
many relevant treaties but has not incorporated them into domestic law. The
country is also not a party to the Rome Statute, which defines crimes against
humanity under international law.
محكمة الجنايات الرابعة بدمشق تحكم على المجرم أحمد حسون بالسجن المؤبد مدى الحياة.#سانا pic.twitter.com/NCQEnIQgMc
— الوكالة العربية السورية للأنباء - سانا (@Sana__gov) August 24, 2026
Questions Over Transitional Justice
That legal gap has drawn criticism from some human-rights lawyers and
researchers. Hiba Zayadin, a senior Human Rights Watch researcher, has said she
considers the trials premature without a settled legal framework establishing
who is tried, when and on what basis. Joumana Seif, a human-rights lawyer who
resigned from Syria's National Commission for Transitional Justice, told Syria
Direct that trials should have waited for parliament to pass a
transitional-justice law. Seif pointed to what she called errors in how some
charges, including war-crimes counts, have been legally characterized.
Both researchers have also questioned the selectivity of the process.
They noted that prosecutions so far have focused only on former
Assad-government figures, while allegations of serious abuses by other armed
factions active during and after the war remain largely unaddressed. That
selectivity, they argue, could shape how Syrians ultimately judge the process's
fairness.
التحريض على القتل قصداً وإثارة النعرات المذهبية والعنصرية.. أبرز التهم التي أدين بها أحمد حسون والحكم عليه بالسجن المؤبد مدى الحياة.#سانا pic.twitter.com/nmcJXALliT
— الوكالة العربية السورية للأنباء - سانا (@Sana__gov) August 24, 2026
Hassoun's Defense and the Evidence
Hassoun contested the case from the outset. At the trial's opening
session on June 25, he denied the charges. He testified that he had stayed in
Syria to help protect people who remained, that video clips used against him
had been taken out of context, and that he did not consider himself a supporter
of the former government, according to a monitoring report by the Syrian
Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC), an independent group that
tracked the proceedings session by session.
At the third hearing on July 23, after prosecutors submitted video
evidence, Hassoun's defense counsel filed a written brief with a flash drive.
The defense formally requested a technical examination of the footage to verify
it had not been altered, and the court accepted the request, SJAC and SANA both
reported. Syria's National Commission for Transitional Justice later said its
own review concluded that editing or excerpting the videos would not affect
their evidentiary value, in part because Hassoun had acknowledged them,
according to the Syrian outlet Enab Baladi.
The fourth session, held July 30, included testimony from an anonymous
witness. The witness told the court that Hassoun had demanded roughly $65,000
in exchange for helping secure the release of the witness's detained sister.
That allegation is consistent with the $195,000 abuse-of-office fine the court
ultimately imposed, equal to three times that sum, though the article treats
the testimony itself as an allegation the court weighed rather than an
independently confirmed fact.
جرائم حرب وجرائم ضد الإنسانية، أدين بها مفتي النظام البائد أحمد بدر الدين حسون، أدت إلى الحكم عليه بالسجن المؤبد مدى الحياة.#سانا pic.twitter.com/oBfVAyReqx
— الوكالة العربية السورية للأنباء - سانا (@Sana__gov) August 24, 2026
Who Was Ahmad Badreddine Hassoun?
Hassoun, 77, was born in Aleppo in 1949. He came from a family with a
tradition of religious scholarship and studied at Cairo's Al-Azhar University.
He served in Syria's parliament from 1990 to 1998. Assad appointed him grand
mufti in 2005, a position in which he was initially known for promoting
interfaith dialogue.
That public image shifted after Syria's 2011 uprising began. Hassoun
aligned himself closely with the government. He blamed foreign interference for
the unrest and described the opposition in terms the government used to
characterize it as terrorism. His son was killed later that year. His outspoken
defense of the government's military campaigns, including its use of barrel
bombs, earned him the nickname "barrel-bomb mufti" among critics.
Assad abolished the office of grand mufti in November 2021. Hassoun went
into hiding after the government's collapse in December 2024. He was arrested
at Damascus airport in March 2025, roughly a month after he had emerged from
hiding, according to Al Jazeera's
reporting.
مدير إدارة المساءلة والمحاسبة في الهيئة الوطنية للعدالة الانتقالية رديف مصطفي يؤكد لـ سانا أن الحكم الصادر بحق المجرم أحمد حسون يستند إلى المعايير الدولية.#سانا pic.twitter.com/W8vX9VLEva
— الوكالة العربية السورية للأنباء - سانا (@Sana__gov) August 24, 2026
The Wider Assad-Era Accountability Process
Hassoun's conviction is the latest in a series of prosecutions Syria's
transitional authorities have pursued since Bashar
al-Assad fled to Russia as his government collapsed. Atef Najib,
Assad's cousin and the former head of political security in Daraa province,
became the first former Assad-era official reported to face trial, when
preliminary proceedings opened in April 2026. He appeared in court in person
and denied the charges against him. On August 11, the Fourth Criminal Court
convicted Najib in person and sentenced him to death. The same ruling issued
death sentences in absentia against Assad, his brother Maher and five other officials
who remain outside Syria, for murder, torture, unlawful detention, war crimes
and crimes against humanity.
On August 18, the court sentenced another Assad cousin, Wasim al-Assad,
to death and ordered his assets confiscated. Judges convicted him of crimes
against humanity and war crimes in a case that also involved drug-trafficking
allegations. Assad and his brother received asylum in Russia after their
government's fall. Syria's new authorities have publicly asked Moscow to hand
them over, though Russia has given no indication it will do so.
Media outlets including Asharq Al-Awsat and Middle East Eye have
described Hassoun as roughly the tenth Assad-era figure sentenced under the new
process. The sources reviewed for this article do not specify a single,
official count, and it remains unclear whether that figure refers to
individuals convicted, individuals sentenced, or completed cases involving
multiple defendants. Syria's National Commission for Transitional Justice,
created by presidential decree in May 2025, has a mandate limited to violations
committed by the former government.
مشاهد من الانتشار الأمني في محيط القصر العدلي بدمشق أثناء محاكمة أحمد حسون.#سانا pic.twitter.com/vUmaA7gtRN
— الوكالة العربية السورية للأنباء - سانا (@Sana__gov) August 24, 2026
What Remains Unresolved
Several important questions about the case, and about the broader
accountability process, remain open based on the sources reviewed for this
report:
●
Whether Hassoun has filed or
intends to file an appeal, and what appellate avenues Syrian law provides for a
life sentence issued under these charges
●
The precise legal weight of the
Constitutional Declaration and international treaties invoked in these trials,
as opposed to a dedicated transitional-justice statute
●
Whether the process's exclusive
focus on former-government figures amounts to selective prosecution, as some
human-rights researchers argue
●
Whether, and how, abuses
attributed to other armed factions will eventually be examined through the same
judicial channel
Syrian officials describe the prosecutions as part of a broader
transitional-justice effort. Independent researchers continue to debate whether
the current legal framework can sustain that description as more cases move
through the Fourth Criminal Court.
The Fourth Criminal Court in Damascus sentences Ahmad Hassoun, grand mufti under the ousted regime, to life imprisonment for inciting violence and justifying killings.#Damascus #Fourth_Criminal_Court #Ahmad_Hassoun pic.twitter.com/vValUvnEfa
— SANA English (@SANAEnOfficial) August 24, 2026
References
Syrian Arab News Agency
(SANA), "Syria sentences ousted regime's mufti Ahmad Hassoun to life for
war crimes," Aug. 24, 2026: sana.sy
Al Jazeera, "'Barrel
bomb mufti' Ahmad Hassoun handed life sentence in Syria trial," Aug. 24,
2026: aljazeera.com
The Washington Post /
Associated Press, "Assad-era's grand mufti sentenced to life in prison by
court in Damascus," Aug. 24, 2026: washingtonpost.com
Asharq Al-Awsat,
"Syria Sentences Assad-Era Top Muslim Cleric to Life Imprisonment,"
Aug. 24, 2026: english.aawsat.com
Middle East Eye,
"Former grand mufti and Assad ally receives life sentence in Syria,"
Aug. 24, 2026: middleeasteye.net
Shafaq News,
"Damascus sentences Al-Assad-era grand mufti to life for inciting
war," Aug. 24, 2026: shafaq.com
Al Jazeera, "Bashar
al-Assad, Atef Najib sentenced to death in landmark Syria trial," Aug. 11,
2026: aljazeera.com
Syria Direct, "As
Atef Najib's trial proceeds, what legal basis exists for transitional
justice?" May 11, 2026: syriadirect.org
Syrian Justice and
Accountability Centre (SJAC), "Inside the Trial of Ahmad Hassoun #1: He
Fears the Lord of the Worlds," 2026: syriaaccountability.org
Syrian Justice and
Accountability Centre (SJAC), "Inside the Trial of Ahmad Hassoun #3: Brief
Session, Defense Brief," Aug. 20, 2026: syriaaccountability.org
Enab Baladi,
"Hassoun Trial Hears Extortion Allegation in Detainee Cases," July
2026: english.enabbaladi.net
SANA, "Fourth
hearing in Ahmad Hassoun trial held before Damascus Criminal Court," July
30, 2026: sana.sy
SANA, "Fourth
Criminal Court to issue verdict in Ahmad Hassoun case Monday," Aug. 24,
2026: sana.sy
International Center for
Transitional Justice (ICTJ), statement welcoming Syria's National Commission
for Transitional Justice: ictj.org
Editor's note: An earlier version of this article referenced a
purported public statement by Syria's foreign minister reacting to the verdict.
That claim could not be independently verified from the sources reviewed and
has been removed.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your comments are important for us. We welcome all the comments relevant with the above content.